ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

Khan Academy

Partial review English

Numbers & MathScienceGamingPreschool LearningPhysicsGeometry

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Channel analysis summary

Khan Academy is a non-profit educational channel providing instructional videos across a wide range of academic subjects. The sampled content focuses on mathematics (geometry, algebra, probability) and AP Physics, utilizing a digital blackboard style to explain complex concepts through examples and formulas.

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
9,410,000
Subscribers
9,271
Videos published
2,224,949,038
Total views

Its 100 most recent uploads

Counted from the uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
100
Published in the last 90 days
1/42
Run 60 seconds or less
6:24
Typical length

Audio language the uploader declared English

Uploads marked made for children 5 of the 42 uploads that carry the label. That marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection, and nobody checks it against the videos.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Educational value High The channel provides high-quality, structured educational content on math and physics.
  • Consistency High Consistent branding, instructional style, and non-profit messaging across all sampled videos.
  • Synthetic media None found Content appears to be standard digital instructional recordings.

Does well Clear focus on academic learning Non-profit mission emphasizing free access to education Structured lessons with clear objectives in descriptions

This is a preliminary review. Some of what we wanted to examine was out of reach when this analysis ran, so it rests on less evidence than a full review. What is published below is accurate as far as it goes; the limitations section says what it could not cover.

Age guidance

younger

The content covers a broad spectrum of academic levels, from 7th-grade math to AP Physics. While suitable for older students, the instructional nature and lack of mature content make it safe for younger students who are at the appropriate academic level for the specific topics.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • External contact

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 90%

    Pushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.

    Links are provided to the official Khan Academy website for further practice and donations.

    Adding and subtracting significant figures | Science Toolkit | Khan Academy Potential energy and conservative forces (part 4) | AP Physics | Khan Academy 2 video(s) cited

  • Stimulation

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    The videos use a steady, instructional pace with simple visual aids.

    Rules of input-output tables Determining similarity in polygons 2 video(s) cited

Nothing found in: language · violence · horror · mature themes · bullying · commercial pressure · adult activities · medical body horror · impersonation

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

100
Videos screened
0
Flagged
0
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 100 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged none. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

The videos behind the findings

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review